With both the Filmfare Awards and the Oscars just finished, what better time than now to deliberate on that eternal question that dominates so many of our heated dinner table debates – do Bollywood flicks really match up to Hollywood standards? Given that this topic inevitably sends emotions running high with everyone busy trying to get their points of view across, the end result is almost always a huge pandemonium; much screaming and shouting, with people at each other’s throats trying to seek agreement to their point, convinced they are the right ones. So the only way, I’ve realized, I can get my views across without rude interruptions and someone telling me to shut up, is by putting my thoughts to words. A clever way to curb dissent and make people listen to you, isn’t it? You can of course choose to disagree in the comments section.
Taking just the films nominated for the Oscars (Avatar, The Blind Side, District 9, An Education, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, A Serious Man, Up, Up in the Air) and the Filmfare awards (3 Idiots, Dev D, Kaminey, Love Aaj Kal, Paa) as respective benchmarks of excellence, I would argue that Hindi films are way below any remote judgment of distinction despite an overall improvement in their quality in the past decade. With the exception of Dev D and to an extent Paa (which was off putting because it was almost like a buy-one-get-one-free family package), none of the others even ventured towards anything faintly meaningful or different. If you limit your definition of good cinema to ‘entertaining’, then yes, 3 Idiots was reasonably entertaining (can’t say the same about either Kaminey or Love Aaj Kal), but do any of these films display histrionics in storytelling, direction or performances? Absolutely not!
Of course there was Firaaq (which I haven’t watched) that got the critics award, but the fact that this was the only thought-provoking, serious film of the year whose primary motive was not just entertainment is a sad comment on an industry that produces over 1000 movies annually. I went through the list of movies that released last year and the only other film that I personally thought was a good attempt was Zoya Akhtar’s Luck By Chance. Most of the others gravely insult your intelligence and aren’t even funny if that’s what you are looking for! In fact there haven’t been more than two or three good films in any given year ever since I can remember going to the cinema. And this is after the supposed reincarnation of Bollywood films, after those 2 decades (the 80s and 90s) where Bollywood ceaselessly embarrassed itself year after year with terrible movies.
Coming now to the Hollywood films that dominated the Oscars – I was awestruck simply by the range of subjects on display, from fantasy to war to human estrangement to an alternative look at history to obesity and racism, and so on and so forth. And if you’ve noticed, none of the nominees were mindless entertainment or repackaged teenybopper love sagas made with the primary motive being box office successes (with the exception of Avatar maybe, which despite its weak storyline was a feat, a labour of love). Almost all of them had brilliant performances, interesting storylines and demonstrated a genuine understanding of the craft, not to mention the huge deal of research that had gone into maintaining the authenticity of the setting and getting the look right.
I often wonder why there is this huge difference in quality when we compare Hollywood with Bollywood. Why can’t we seem to move beyond mindless entertainment and tackle more challenging, thought-provoking subjects?
Many would say our films have different compulsions and different budgets so drawing equivalence would be unfair. I disagree. An engaging script (which can be entertaining as well) is the essence of any movie – and that’s where we fall back in comparison with Hollywood productions. We are on par with any film industry in the world when it comes to the technical aspects, but no amount of money can save a film if it has a weak script. Most filmmakers seem to be taking people’s intelligence for a ride by rehashing old wine in a new bottle, compensating a good storyline with snazzy locations and big stars, and that isn’t working anymore!
It’s time our makers took more risks and made movies with some conviction (half of them look like they are desperately trying to get the ‘Hit’ formula right!). Bollywood is in grave danger of caricaturing itself, because our films are so hopelessly out of sync with reality. (All that singing and dancing only happens in films!) Perhaps it’s time to grow up, and the first step would be to clear the misunderstanding that reality is boring, that only fantasy works in providing entertainment!
C’mon, our real lives are a lot more interesting than some banal love triangle!



Nikhil has a Masters in Broadcast Journalism from the University of Westminster, London. He began his career with Times Now - a leading English language news channel in India and went on to become Associate Producer for News Features at Bloomberg UTV, Mumbai. He is currently living in London straddling 2-3 part-time jobs. He spends his free time and money traveling, reading fiction, deciding to exercise and wondering what to do next in life!

Peta Jinnath Andersen is a freelance and fiction writer. Born in Sydney, Australia, to a Fiji-Indian father and Scottish mother, she’s a bit confused about her background, but loves it all the same. Currently living in the US, she has just had her first child, and is busy studying hard in an effort to learn more about her Indian heritage – including taking Hindi lessons – so she can teach her son about just what it is that makes an NRI special.


on March 19, 2010
at 12:39 am
Oh, I don’t think you’re being fair to Bollywood. The stuff at the Oscars and the Academy Awards is in no way representative of the dross that Hollywood usually turns out.
Your point about weak script is why I stopped watching all but a very few Hollywood movies at all, ever.
Hot Tub Time Machine is more an example of Hollywood’s usual standards than the Oscar fare ever is.
on March 19, 2010
at 1:17 pm
can’t compare…….may be on technical basis but not content wise…………both are two different world….the content or the bases on which they can make movies is much more vast…..like they can explore the animation, sexuality, real life heroes and horror genres much better …….where as Indian Movie Industry is more about India….the movies are much more closer to us doesn’t matter the content is stolen from other other movies…….
on March 19, 2010
at 2:08 pm
@Gori Girl – Which is precisely why I took only the good ones from each side as ‘benchmarks’ and didn’t even mention the bad ones. Also for arguments sake try and compare Hot Tub Time Machine with a Kambakth Ishq for instance (In this case the worst possible from both ends) and I am sure the former is still a lot better…
Hitesh – I still think an ‘Indian centric’ film like you say, can be more meaningful than what is currently on offer!
on March 19, 2010
at 2:42 pm
LOL I’d rather watch a trashy Hindi flick than a trashy American one, but then I’m sick of trashy American films. Some of my favorite films are from India — though I don’t think that Deepa Mehta’s work can be considered Bollywood.
on March 19, 2010
at 3:44 pm
Oh so glad that there’s finally an article on this topic
I must say I agree with Nikhil on Hitesh’s comment. To add further, India did have some really meaningful content films, but few and far between. Cases in point: Filhaal, where surrogate motherhood is explored as a non-taboo option. My Brother Nikhil (not Inamdar), which is one of the first -and few – movies on homosexuality.
It’s not like Bollywood doesn’t have any meaningful content or intelligent writers (or smart ticket-buyers for that matter). The sad part is that we continue to glorify films that are made only for profits. How else does one explain a ‘Best Film’ category and a ‘Critics’ Choice’ category?
on March 20, 2010
at 7:13 am
@nik
yea i do agree on that……….but i think cinema is getting much more realistic now days….
on April 22, 2010
at 10:41 am
Flawed comparison, IMHO. The Filmfare awards are not given by a jury from a reputed body like the Academy of Motion pictures, but by a film magazine. It is worthwhile to compare the Oscar with the National awards.
And the winner, Antaheen, is a fine movie, talking about loneliness and the wait for a perfect relationship. And for a movie on internet relationships, it is not cheesy like You’ve Got Mail, by far.
on June 7, 2010
at 5:40 am
Filmfare being a popular award given by a film magazine isn’t even worthy of a comparison with the Oscars. Also, you are clearly biased towards Hollywood. It’s obvious that you’d look for even the slightest positive in a Hollywood film while overlooking all its obvious fallacies, while when it comes to Bollywood, every aspect has to be inch-perfect. It’s pretty useless to get into specifics ‘coz clearly you’ll turn a blind eye to any argument, no matter how much merit it has.
on July 2, 2010
at 2:03 pm
I do agree with you, nikhil. Bollywood films are rather weak in mostly everything and are totally pathetic! But even Hollywood churns some rather bad films. Hollywood by no means is a perfect film industry.
on July 7, 2010
at 2:17 pm
I think to this I just want to say that Bollywood is getting there… We don’t have many films that can take on Hollywood but this is on the rise. For example, Lagaan and Taare Zameen Par were nominated for an Oscar. Disney bought the rights for TZP and have marketed it in the UK and US to all audiences. Also the asian influence in Hollywood is on the increase… We’ve had Gurinder Chadda doing her thing for years now but how can we forget the impace Slumdog had. Recent example is Kites… even thought it didn’t do too well there were two versions, the ‘western’ version being shortened with less song and dance.
We may not be there yet but the ideology is there and so is the talent.
on August 6, 2010
at 8:21 pm
Most of the hollywood films are trash.
Those that are good are not commercially
successful. Hurt Locker is a pointer to that.
on August 18, 2010
at 10:29 am
How about Karthik Calling! a wonderful subject.
Talking about subject, have you seen Tahaan, a story about a mule and young boy, Dumkata, a story about two young brothers.
If you are critiquing, have you seen them all.
on August 19, 2010
at 9:23 am
Very True! And they call it The New Wave in Indian Cinema. This new wave consists of many inspiration from international cinema. I’ve boycotted Bollywood movies terrified of loosing the experience of watching its original. I’m aware I don’t need a brain to make a Bollywood movie only kidneys. But, unfortunately I’ve no other option to become an international filmmaker other than starting out here.
on September 7, 2010
at 11:43 am
I agree with in almost all cases, except in your reference to Kaminey, which one of the best thrillers in Hindi cinema till date(trust me, I am no fan of Bollywood and I live on American cinema). Dev D may have been innovative, but it was far from refined. It was lauded because of the theme it dealt with.